On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 21:22, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
--- The Cunctator cunctator@kband.com wrote:
Yes, it would. Gotta love that passive voice: "the [[communist state]] article was intended..." By whom, I wonder.
Moreover, if you read the content of the [[communist state]] entry, it's evident that it's not just about theory.
I'm just repeating what was said previously on this list.
The question which, like Chthulu, rises forbiddingly from the depths, is: why did you do so?
And I'm not trying to be pusillanimous. I'm just trying to point out that avoiding the passive voice is healthy practice.