On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 14:01, Brion Vibber wrote:
Je Ĵaŭdo 22 Majo 2003 10:55, Daniel Ehrenberg skribis:
The [[communist state]] article was intended for the discussion of how the communist system was *supposed to * work. If you are writing about how it actually works in real life, you should write at [[communist government]].
Pardon me, but that seems like a real strange way to make the distinction. Wouldnt' it make more sense to split it up explicitly?
eg, [[Communist states in theory]] [[Communist states in practice]]
Yes, it would. Gotta love that passive voice: "the [[communist state]] article was intended..." By whom, I wonder.
Moreover, if you read the content of the [[communist state]] entry, it's evident that it's not just about theory.