On Tue, 13 May 2003, Anthere wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:22:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthere anthere6@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] 172's sysop request and some random thoughts
--- Andrew Smith ams80@cam.ac.uk wrote:
While we're nominating people for sysop-hood I'd like to nominate Anthere, from what I've seen she has been an excellent contributor. In light of the below I'm not sure if she'd accept but I think it would be polite to ask.
I thank you Andrew for that kindness. TC also suggested that I asked 3 weeks ago. It was definitly *not* something I wanted to be 3 weeks ago. For I already have to help keeping clean two places. But three weeks ago, a sysop was not was it is heading to be in the near future. So, I dunno.
If still needed, I'll second *her* (I'm not going to forget that anytime soon!).
Meanwhile, I thank *JohnOwens* very much for having deleted my images, one of which was copyrighted. I suggest the ''Wikipedia:Personal subpages to be deleted'' to be rethought for it seems to have low usability.
I am still hoping to have the last of the *very* interesting redirections of Fat Budda made 3 weeks ago deleted in time.
I must confess, this afternoon, I have been thinking the deletion could be sped up if I added some obscenities in these blank pages. It seems vandalised pages are deleted within a day, to compare with weeks in due process and unknown time for blanked pages. Similarly, when I mess a redirect, and have to ask for the old location to be deleted to make the move back, it might be more efficient to vandalize the page to be deleted rather than putting it in the vote for deletion page perhaps ?
Of course, this was just a wild thought :-) I would not do such a thing, would I ???? I am an extremely reasonable woman :-)
Might work with some, but not on me; anything which isn't just-created, I check its history, to make sure there's nothing that isn't clearly "patent nonsense" in there either. If it isn't entirely patent nonsense, I'd rather wait the week on VFD. So keep the cuss words to yourself. ;)
? is the plural of process processes ? maybe not ...?!?
Yes, it is.