The point, Cunc, is not the worth of the edit (though it was (a) in the wrong entry, and (b) grossly one-sided - communist governments tend to be rather good at somethings, notably health care and education: which of course, Fred being Fred, he was determined to utterly ignore).
The point is is the dishonesty. Go look at that edit history: it was no accident, it was repeated 19 or 20 times, with no apology.
Then look at the wild and untrue accusations made about other contributors on the list.
Did you see *me* yelling? So why am *I* suddenly placed in the path of this loose cannon on the mailing list?
One rule for all. That is fair. If Fred's actions are acceptable (which I dispute), then what shred of an excuse does he pin his opposition to Abe on?
Tony Wilson (Tannin)