Smart lad: these are all good questions. They cut right to the heart of the matter
(I'll let the others take a crack at them first).
Lazy Uncle Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Ehrenberg [mailto:name12323@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 5:30 PM
To: wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] NPOV
I have a few questions about NPOV:
Is it POV to classify something as a pseudoscience (and say that it's
definitely not true)?
Is it POV to say that communism never works in practice? (or something
similar)
Is it POV to only list some of the facts (by accident or on purpose) leading
someone to believe one point of view?
Is it POV to use words that can be '''interperated''' as
insulting?