What is your specific objection to user:Michael?
If he's just sloppy with facts, then keep following him around and quietly fixing his errors. Eventually, he'll either decide to be more careful or just get tired.
Is he reverting your fixes, even when you've documented that your fixes are accurate?
Uncle Ed
-----Original Message----- From: Tucci [mailto:tucci528@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:35 PM To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] Michael
Have we given Michael enough chances to change his ways? I just went through his user contributions, and reverted several changes to simple and verifiable facts like when a band formed or released an album when googling has revealed the original was right (or at least, assumable as right until proven otherwise). He's shown a complete disregard for community standards and has never appeared to have any desire to make a useful enyclopedia instead of a list-of-badly-written-facts-that-Michael-has-made-up-ipedia. I'm a Wikipedia contributor, not his English tutor, fact-checker or baby-sitter.
TUF-KAT