Jimmy-
What *is* the argument here? That all 130,000 articles of Wikipedia have to be blocked because there are a dozen that describe "highly unusual sex practices"? Do you really think that is convincing?
No, that is *not* the argument, not even close.
The argument is "We need filtering software installed in the schools because even a superb site such as Wikipedia, which should be available to children, contains explicit sexual content about obscure sexual practices. It would be nice if such sites took a responsible approach to things, but they don't, and so we have to do it."
Once again, do what? Filter Wikipedia entirely? Do you really think they can get away with that? And if they just want to filter the respective pages, what do we care?
Regards,
Erik