Jimmy-
> What *is* the argument here? That all 130,000
articles of Wikipedia
> have to be blocked because there are a dozen that describe "highly
> unusual sex practices"? Do you really think that is convincing?
No, that is *not* the argument, not even close.
The argument is "We need filtering software
installed in the schools
because even a superb site such as Wikipedia, which should be
available to children, contains explicit sexual content about obscure
sexual practices. It would be nice if such sites took a responsible
approach to things, but they don't, and so we have to do it."
Once again, do what? Filter Wikipedia entirely? Do you really think they
can get away with that? And if they just want to filter the respective
pages, what do we care?
Regards,
Erik