Daniel Mayer wrote:
Anthere wrote:
There are no limits to what we can assume people might label "to be censored". Which is why I am against *us* defining what could be censored.
You hit the nail on the head (sic. you are 100% right, IMO). That is why we need a bunch of external team certification/sifter projects setting their own criteria. Let them deal with these issues and let us get back to business writting a complete, accurate and NPOV encyclopedia.
Keeping in mind that many of "us" will want to work on a Sifter/Edupedia project.
-- Toby