Zoe wrote:
--- Daniel Ehrenberg littledanehren@yahoo.com wrote:
well that doesn't prohibit unrevereting of his good edits, does it? --LittleDan
Yes, it does. There is no such thing as a good Michael edit. Unless you want to to go the trouble of verifying that every single thing he wrote was correct, don't even try to think that there is a good Michael edit.
Yeah, but they're gradually improving, at least in the examples I've seen. His attitude, unfortunately, isn't though.