Zoe wrote:
--- Daniel Ehrenberg <littledanehren(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
well that doesn't prohibit unrevereting of his
good
edits, does it?
--LittleDan
Yes, it does. There is no such thing as a good
Michael edit. Unless you want to to go the trouble of
verifying that every single thing he wrote was
correct, don't even try to think that there is a good
Michael edit.
Yeah, but they're gradually improving, at least in the examples I've
seen. His attitude, unfortunately, isn't though.