Brion Vibber wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
>Kingturtle wrote:
>>pages that are blanked for reasons regarding
banned users should be
>>marked as such. please make it very clear to the other users why
>>you are doing it.
>This is a quite reasonable request, but the
technical system
>that we have to make reversion easy -- the rollback feature --
>doesn't have a space for comments. And ideas for aiding that?
Hmm... that would defeat the purpose of it being a
one-click mass
timesaver. If you need to add comments, probably best to follow the
usual procedure via page history.
So do you think that reverting Michael's edits require comments?
If so, then it'll be a lot slower for Zoe et al to do so.
Or, do you think that Kingturtle (and newer users)
don't need to be reminded in every reversion about Michael?
If so, then there'll continue to be mistaken re-reversions.
-- Toby