Look, James, I know that it's fun slandering me, but I would appreciate it if you could stop for a second and actually read what I wrote. Thanks.
Yes I did read what you wrote and no I am not slandering you. I have a great deal of respect for you but I think unilaterally rewriting a policy page without a debate is grossly wrong. I am not always on wiki, neither are most people. How are we to know if you have made a major change to a page if by the time we come on your change has slipped from the Recent Changes list, unless we go into every policy page and link it to our watchlist. A debate can only happen if people know about it.
There are plenty of things on the policy pages that I believe are misguided but I would not dream of going on and unilaterally changing them. I have noticed a few changes to policy pages (not by you BTW). I always presumed that they must have been debated and agreed first and that I had simply missed the debate. Now you have me wondering if every change ''was'' debated or if they were the unilateral work of some user that no-one noticed in time, they know becoming a 'rule' by default.
JT.
_________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail