I have just been said I was abusing the list, because sending two many mails and in double sometimes.
I wish to say that I sent many mails because I thought I could answer to criticism (RK), to comments (Steve) and to questions and request (Jimbo).
I sent double mails because I have pb with one of my work computer configuration (the other one is the one doing the wrong indentation someone mentionned). This is not mine to be able to do anything, but the firm admin. I have no right to install a new browser, nor to reinstall the current one. Hence, either I stop sending mail, or MB put the filter on my name as he said he would do.
I thought that in an edit war, the ones involved in the edit war were welcome to give their opinion once the article was frozen, in the talk page. I was told no to, to let others discuss the matter. Hence, I will not comment any more. If anyone think I could help them understanding the topic in any way, please drop me a message. I am doubtful of how I could feel entirely happy with the outcome if I have no voice at all on the matter. I certainly did not want to say my opinion would weight in any way in the final outcome, but perhaps proper arguments would have been receivable. But I will gladly let others than RK and I work on the topic. I hope that before the final decision is taken, I will be asked by Jimbo perhaps what I think of the resulting proposal and if I have anything else to say. I also hope I will be told when I can come back on the topic. I still fail to see how this could be called consensus if the ones in the edit wars are asked to keep out of this consensus.
I also hope that RK does not go on insulting me on this mailing list.
Thanks
Have a good day or week all.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com