No objections here. I'd just like to caution others against seeing this as an issue of good versus evil. I don't mean to preemptively accuse Zoe, as she has, from what I understand, a pretty good track record, but I wish to see both Lir and Zoe being held to the same standards. Lir shouldn't get any lenience because he/she (I'm confused) is learning what constitutes a good contribution, and Zoe should not get any lenience because she is in a more authoritative. I hope my comments don't seem presumptuous or accusatory. I'm still quite the newbie/outsider in Wikipedia terms, I think.