No objections here. I'd just like to caution others against seeing this
as an issue of good versus evil. I don't mean to preemptively accuse
Zoe, as she has, from what I understand, a pretty good track record, but
I wish to see both Lir and Zoe being held to the same standards. Lir
shouldn't get any lenience because he/she (I'm confused) is learning
what constitutes a good contribution, and Zoe should not get any
lenience because she is in a more authoritative. I hope my comments
don't seem presumptuous or accusatory. I'm still quite the
newbie/outsider in Wikipedia terms, I think.