Jonathan,
1. Engaging in an edit war is beneath your dignity. I thought, based on our private correspondence, that you were above such things.
2. *sigh* Must I remind you that two wrongs don't make a right? Warnings will be directed at ALL parties who are in the wrong; not just the other edit warriors.
Please try to understand the difference between objective fact and neutrality. For example, that North Korea, Cuba, and the Soviet Union were ruled by murderous tyrants is IMHO a "fact". Incredible as it may seem, there are some contributors who dispute this fact. So, we are forced by *our own policy* to step back from asserting "the truth" and humbly stating that "According to sources X, Y and Z these lands were ruled, etc."
Likewise, you may have some crucially important information about social workers in your clutches ;-) but for the sake of our neutrality policy WE MUST say, e.g., "Source X says that social workers are trained this way, and Source Y says that social workers aid kidnappers, etc."
You've got these nasty SW fiends by the short hairs, Jonathan. If you want to give them what Robert Heinlean calls the Kansas City clutch, all you have to do, Jonathan, is attribute your sources.
What's so hard about that?
Ed Poor