Wow. I am SO in support of this. I would heartily copy every garbage edit to this site
prior to deletion. Let's implement this! Do you want the copyright violations, too?
RickK
"Daniel P.B.Smith" <dpbsmith(a)verizon.net> wrote:
From: NSK
On Saturday 23 October 2004 13:36, Rebecca wrote:
What self-respecting encyclopedia gives me the
right
to write an article on my deceased cat?
I see no reason why the online WP couldn't have such an article.
Obviously the
1.0 paper edition couldn't, but if you have disk space and you flag the
"non-encyclopedic" articles as such, there is absolutely no problem.
There is no problem if what you are trying to do is something other
than create an encyclopedia.
There is a _big_ problem _if_ what you are trying to do is create an
encyclopedia.
Wikipedia is a project whose purpose is to create a free encyclopedia.
Encyclopedias should not contain "non-encyclopedic articles." You do
not improve an encyclopedia by putting in non-encyclopedic articles,
any more than you would improve the Superbowl by putting in a
performance of _Hamlet_.
You say we are removing valuable content from Wikipedia. Well, all of
this material is GFDL-licensed just like everythiing else, and you are
perfectly free to copy it into Wikinerds.
Furthermore, if you are serious about the value of this material, and
if _you_ have disk space, I believe the community here would be
agreeable to set up some continuing arrangement whereby every article,
prior to deletion, is emailed to you for inclusion in Wikinerds. The
total volume is really not that large; far less than an active USENET
newsgroup. if you check the deletion log,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_log , you will see that
about 500 deletions were made on 22 October. Most were _extremely
short_, less than 200 bytes each but even if we assume an average size
of 5000 bytes that's only 2.5 megabytes. (I believe the real number
would be well under 500K). And disk is cheap.
If you not sure you actually want content like "SOMETHING THAT
PHILLIPPE GEORGE TUCK SAYS, FROM CALNE IN WILTSHIRE WHEN HE IS VERY
VERY DRUNK AND I LOVE HIM LOADS" or "fvgkfcgyufdcyrfdrt7rsx5esasees==
Headline text ==kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkmnjknjvyhi
ancstdxydtsjsxtesb'ljasgvbjo..." or ""Hocus Pocus (novel)"
(content
was: 'poop')," we could send you only articles that are deleted as an
outcome of the VfD process. That's only 20 articles per day; if we
assume an average of 5000 bytes, that's only 100K per day. I think the
real amount of traffic would be less than 30K per day.
Is Wikinerds interested in such arrangement?
Perhaps we could even set up a mailing list whose content is all the
material deleted from Wikipedia. Anyone concerned about what is being
deleted could subscribe.
--
Daniel P. B. Smith, dpbsmith(a)verizon.net
"Elinor Goulding Smith's Great Big Messy Book" is now back in print!
Sample chapter at
http://world.std.com/~dpbsmith/messy.html
Buy it at
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1403314063/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.