Unfortunately, when I made a proposal to formalise this notion a few weeks ago it was unanimously gunned down, people voting to keep content of article as an AfD criteria.
Molu
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:53:14 +0200 From: "Steve Bennett" Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Cruft To: "English Wikipedia" Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 03/05/06, Gallagher Mark George wrote:
encyclopaedia article). Articles that need work and could one day
become real gems, >however, are put on AfD all the time, and this is a pity.
This should never happen. AfD is totally superfluous when the *topic* belongs in WP. Someone should just remove all the crud they don't like and turn it into a stub at worst.
Steve
--------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.