* Sascha Noyes <sascha(a)pantropy.net> [2004-01-26]:
... What were we talking about
again? Oh yeah, Catholic Encyclopedia articles are a bad starting point for
"real" encyclopedia articles. ;-)
After reading all this thread (and agreeing more or less on its spirit), I
have to say that all these "CE is pathetic" is the same as as saying "I
found a bug in
Apache and several security issues, instead of fixing it I simply shall
tell other web managers not to use Apache as a starting point to serve web
pages". Is it reasonable? How many non-dogmatic non-doctrinal articles are
there in the CE which contain real facts?
By the way, I have only read the CE twice -repeat twice- in my life, I am
just trying to explain that your "concern" about its seriousness is quite
quite unfair.
Cheers,
Pedro.
--
Pedro Fortuny Ayuso:
http://pfortuny.sdf-eu.org
Colegio Mayor PeƱafiel, Universidad de Valladolid
C/ Estudios 6, 47005 Valladolid, Spain -->
www.cmpenafiel.org
pfortuny(a)sdf-eu.org Tfn. Nr. 34 983 298277