In a message dated 2/17/2008 5:22:59 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, raphael@psi.co.at writes:
Yes your last mail indeed is very instructive as it tells me, that you have no clue about Islam. In fact the Holy Family is very important for Muslims>>
--------------------------------------------- I know this, this is my point. They create and display images, representational (since no one knows what the Holy Family looked like), already, in their homes.
I don't have an idea what your point is exactly. I was pointing out that many, if not most Muslims, already have images of humans. The "no human representation" is a minority view, and the idea that Muhammed's image is in a separate category is even more of a minority view.
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
WJhonson@aol.com schrieb:
The "no human representation" is a minority view, and the idea that Muhammed's image is in a separate category is even more of a minority view.
No it's not. It is a very common view to oppose images of Muhammad.