Poor, Edmund W wrote:
But all is not lost. If we mark articles as bad or stub, we
could keep
them somewhat hidden from the public.
*COUGH* validation feature *COUGH*
'cuse me, I'm recovering from a cold ;-)
Magnus
Jeez Louise, Magnus: WHEN are you going to turn on the validation feature? Are you waiting for Anthere or someone to "certify" that there is a "consensus" to try out the feature?
Please just turn it on. We will all play with it for a few weeks and decide if it should be permanent.
And if there's a "performance degradation", surely you will detect that problem and yank the feature. But you already assured us that this is highly unlikely.
Ed Poor A professional software developer at a major TV network
Poor, Edmund W wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
*COUGH* validation feature *COUGH*
Jeez Louise, Magnus: WHEN are you going to turn on the validation feature?
As far as I understand, Magnus doesn't have the access or the right to turn the feature on. So don't blame him for not doing it; he's probably more frustrated about it than anyone else, since he wrote it.
Timwi
Timwi wrote:
Poor, Edmund W wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
*COUGH* validation feature *COUGH*
Jeez Louise, Magnus: WHEN are you going to turn on the validation feature?
As far as I understand, Magnus doesn't have the access or the right to turn the feature on. So don't blame him for not doing it; he's probably more frustrated about it than anyone else, since he wrote it.
Yup. [bites into carpet]