I urge list readers to recognize that this is false.
It is
no mere difference of opinion. What she claims NEVER
HAPPENED. It is that simple.
you forgot several paragraphs in your move.
could someone restore also the international link that
was lost in his process
No one here is censoring here, or removing content
from the
Wikipedia. All I have done is introduce standard
Wikipedia
disambiguation techniques. However, Anthere still
rants as
if disambiguation is a form of censorship or
persecution.
(It is not.) We have tried to disabuse her of her
notion,
but she becoms more agitated by the day.
I invite anyone to look at what he hid in [[Gaia
theory predecessors]].
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Gaia_theory_predecessors&ol…
I might be wrong on the definition of the word
prececessors, because of the content of this article
has nothing to do with predecessors.
Anthere now claims "Please. Now, notice; I read
the
first
paragraph of RK new page. And the first paragraph is
false.
That is a good start. It states the first person who
hold
the idea that all organisms on a planet regulate the
biosphere to the benefit of the whole, was Lovelock.
This
is just false. It will take hours to correct his
changes. I
am plain disgusted."
Of course, what she writes is simply not true. It is
easy
for her to continually rake me over the coals, as
she
simply makes stuff up, an attacks me for beliefs I
do not
have, and positions I do not hold. I have
repeatedly
clarified my positions, and she just ignores the
clarifications.
You have wrotten in the introduction that Lovelock was
at the origin of the gaia idea. Then, below, is a
whole list of people who have been saying many things
on this idea.
So, be consistent. Either you admit that Lovelock
wasnot the inventor of the concept, or let's remove
*everything* that is prior to Lovelock.
There are no limits to the falsity right now anyway.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com