Anthere bizarrely claims "If you decide to force us not to edit the page (ie, by protecting it, I will of course not edit it), I ask that the page be kept in a state that is decent toward my own personal acceptance that the page is reunited against my belief for it to be the best option. That means, not censored by RK"
I urge list readers to recognize that this is false. It is no mere difference of opinion. What she claims NEVER HAPPENED. It is that simple.
No one here is censoring here, or removing content from the Wikipedia. All I have done is introduce standard Wikipedia disambiguation techniques. However, Anthere still rants as if disambiguation is a form of censorship or persecution. (It is not.) We have tried to disabuse her of her notion, but she becoms more agitated by the day.
Anthere now claims "Please. Now, notice; I read the first paragraph of RK new page. And the first paragraph is false. That is a good start. It states the first person who hold the idea that all organisms on a planet regulate the biosphere to the benefit of the whole, was Lovelock. This is just false. It will take hours to correct his changes. I am plain disgusted."
Of course, what she writes is simply not true. It is easy for her to continually rake me over the coals, as she simply makes stuff up, an attacks me for beliefs I do not have, and positions I do not hold. I have repeatedly clarified my positions, and she just ignores the clarifications.
Folks, if you want to lie about my beliefs, and then attack me for these non-existent beliefs, go right ahead. But it really is quite sad. I would think that this is a bannable offense.
Robert (RK)
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
I urge list readers to recognize that this is false. It is no mere difference of opinion. What she claims NEVER HAPPENED. It is that simple.
you forgot several paragraphs in your move. could someone restore also the international link that was lost in his process
No one here is censoring here, or removing content from the Wikipedia. All I have done is introduce standard Wikipedia disambiguation techniques. However, Anthere still rants as if disambiguation is a form of censorship or persecution. (It is not.) We have tried to disabuse her of her notion, but she becoms more agitated by the day.
I invite anyone to look at what he hid in [[Gaia theory predecessors]]. http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Gaia_theory_predecessors&old...
I might be wrong on the definition of the word prececessors, because of the content of this article has nothing to do with predecessors.
Anthere now claims "Please. Now, notice; I read the first paragraph of RK new page. And the first paragraph is false. That is a good start. It states the first person who hold the idea that all organisms on a planet regulate the biosphere to the benefit of the whole, was Lovelock. This is just false. It will take hours to correct his changes. I am plain disgusted."
Of course, what she writes is simply not true. It is easy for her to continually rake me over the coals, as she simply makes stuff up, an attacks me for beliefs I do not have, and positions I do not hold. I have repeatedly clarified my positions, and she just ignores the clarifications.
You have wrotten in the introduction that Lovelock was at the origin of the gaia idea. Then, below, is a whole list of people who have been saying many things on this idea.
So, be consistent. Either you admit that Lovelock wasnot the inventor of the concept, or let's remove *everything* that is prior to Lovelock.
There are no limits to the falsity right now anyway.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com