In a message dated 5/21/2008 11:02:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, nawrich@gmail.com writes:
FT2 has repeated that the block on Eleemosynary will be lifted if he/she agrees not to repeat the real names of pseudonymous editors.
What further object do you hope to achieve?>>
-----------------------
To be an instrument in bringing a valued editor back into the project.
Will Johnson
**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
The mechanism for that is fairly straightforward - would you like for him to come back and be free to continue to refer to Durova by her real name? If he agrees not to, he's unblocked. Why would he not agree, except to preserve his "right" to troll by refusing to honor her preference?
Nathan
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:05 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 5/21/2008 11:02:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, nawrich@gmail.com writes:
FT2 has repeated that the block on Eleemosynary will be lifted if he/she agrees not to repeat the real names of pseudonymous editors.
What further object do you hope to achieve?>>
To be an instrument in bringing a valued editor back into the project.
Will Johnson
**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
nawrich@gmail.com writes:
FT2 has repeated that the block on Eleemosynary will be lifted if he/she agrees not to repeat the real names of pseudonymous editors.
What further object do you hope to achieve?
To be an instrument in bringing a valued editor back into the project.
Your engagement and discussion here doesn't seem to be oriented towards that goal, however.
There are two ways to do that:
1. Convince Eleemosynary to abide by the behavior restrictions FT2 noted, which are existing policy and applicable to the situation as described.
2. Explain enough of the situation accurately that people can look into it themselves, determine if there was a policy or admin behavior violation involved, and work to convince either FT2 or the admin community to reverse that decision.
What you did was not applicable to 1 and not sufficient for 2, and now that I have enough information I doubt that 2 is appropriate as a solution anyways.