In a message dated 10/27/2008 8:35:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, snowspinner@gmail.com writes:
We fucked it up here, and our policies did not enable us to fix it. That is a problem.>>
-------- No we didn't "fuck it up". He was a director, even if that job was only two weeks long. It was a question of emphasis, not a question of accuracy.
I gave you a way to fix the system. Continuing to complain about it, is ineffective.
Will Johnson **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics – check it out! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir= http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)
On Oct 27, 2008, at 11:55 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/27/2008 8:35:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, snowspinner@gmail.com writes:
We fucked it up here, and our policies did not enable us to fix it. That is a problem.>>
No we didn't "fuck it up". He was a director, even if that job was only two weeks long. It was a question of emphasis, not a question of accuracy.
You're drawing another theoretical distinction that is devoid of real- world use. We had bad information. We were informed that our information was bad. We opted to continue having the bad information. That is fucking it up.
I gave you a way to fix the system. Continuing to complain about it, is ineffective.
Why implement a technical solution that requires coding when the "edit this page" button can be used to remove the offending text from the policy pages in seconds.
-Phil