In a message dated 9/13/2009 3:27:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
Brian.Mingus(a)colorado.edu writes:
How is this different than the "peer review"
at Wikipedia?>>
Wikipedia has no peer review at all.
I can make an edit and it instantly appears.
In addition, I get no "credit" line for my work.
WikiJournal would be *by* so-and-so and reviewed by *A* *B* and *C*
(peers).
And then get 74 votes averaging 3.7 stars... or whatever.
That sort of thing.
You get a credit-line, just like in E.B.
That would be a major draw, in my mind.
Will