New subject: FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
On 7/5/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
This is acceptable as research into a Wikipedia event
for our own purposes.
It has no place in any article as original research.
Um, no. Simply citing an original source is not in itself original
research, and in any case it can be (and really ought to be0 linked to
as an external link. Anyway, whatever happened to "Wikipedia is not
censored"? People should understand that links to external sites may
lead them to less-than-pleasant reading experiences.
I had not come across this thread before, but it seems to me that
linking to it does improve the encyclopedia, in article space no less.
The risk of people wandering off and finding the other (supposedly
inaccurate) revelations of identity seems overstated in comparison;
indeed, the thread really doesn't give any indication they are even
there, as far as I can tell (except for the link to DB's "hivemind"
pages, which at any given time may or may not be there).