In a message dated 7/23/2008 1:17:52 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, risker.wp@gmail.com writes:
You haven't been paying attention. There are all kinds of BLP violations on user and user talk pages, the vast majority of them unrecognised and unaddressed. >>
---------------------------
Then address them. Wiping all history is not the way to so do. I submit that you can't find five such violations, keeping in mind that "BLP violation" is in the eye of the beholder as we all should know.
If you can, address them.
Will Johnson
**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Then address them. Wiping all history is not the way to so do.
What exactly about noindexing pages removes their history?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Chris Howie cdhowie@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Then address them. Wiping all history is not the way to so do.
What exactly about noindexing pages removes their history?
Nothing. The principal benefit that I can see about blocking Search engines to anything but Article, Image, and Portal space is that our readers see and find the real content, that we're producing. With real life names, defamation, libel, BLP vios, and lord knows what else buried in archives of DRV, AFD, user talk, project space... how does it benefit us to let all that hang out? So the occassional user can "search about" another user? Does not compute.
- Joe