We're going to lose a perfectly good potential bureaucrat to a pusilanimous beauty contest if you don't get down and at least consider whether Kelly Martin deserves your vote.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Tony Sidaway wrote:
We're going to lose a perfectly good potential bureaucrat to a pusilanimous beauty contest if you don't get down and at least consider whether Kelly Martin deserves your vote.
Can we get rid of Raul while we're at it? He's ugly.
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
Tony Sidaway wrote:
We're going to lose a perfectly good potential bureaucrat to a pusilanimous beauty contest if you don't get down and at least consider whether Kelly Martin deserves your vote.
From what I've seen she would be good, but I do not participate in these votes at all. It would feel it unethical if I only participated when there was a candidate that I liked.
Ec
On 11/8/05, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
We're going to lose a perfectly good potential bureaucrat to a pusilanimous beauty contest if you don't get down and at least consider whether Kelly Martin deserves your vote.
From what I've seen she would be good, but I do not participate in these votes at all. It would feel it unethical if I only participated when there was a candidate that I liked.
Ec
Well I have a long standing policy of only voteing in the cases of users I've herd of.
-- geni