In a message dated 7/12/2009 4:39:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, fredbaud@fairpoint.net writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block& page=User%3ARebroad
there were four previous blocks. A week might have been a bit better, but a month is not excessive.>>
-------------
I find it just a little bit unfair, to bring up things a person did *two years* ago. Two years in Wikitime is like 100 centuries in real life.
The block should be related to what they have done recently, not forever.
Will Johnson
************** Looking for love this summer? Find it now on AOL Personals. (http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove00000003)
2009/7/13 WJhonson@aol.com:
In a message dated 7/12/2009 4:39:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, fredbaud@fairpoint.net writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block& page=User%3ARebroad
there were four previous blocks. A week might have been a bit better, but a month is not excessive.>>
I find it just a little bit unfair, to bring up things a person did *two years* ago. Two years in Wikitime is like 100 centuries in real life.
The block should be related to what they have done recently, not forever.
Indeed, the only recent block was for 24 hours. 48 hours or maybe a week would be reasonable, a month seems excessive.
In a message dated 7/12/2009 4:39:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, fredbaud@fairpoint.net writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block& page=User%3ARebroad
there were four previous blocks. A week might have been a bit better, but a month is not excessive.>>
I find it just a little bit unfair, to bring up things a person did *two years* ago. Two years in Wikitime is like 100 centuries in real life.
The block should be related to what they have done recently, not forever.
Will Johnson
That is a good principle.
Fred