I urge everyone here to read my two posts in this thread carefuly (they are not too lengthy), it a rather fitting illustration, I challenge, as to the double-speak meaning of the passage cited bellow. Such a lengthy polemic might be useful as a political pamphlet, but I would hope that the other posters reading this thread can draw from this discussion more than finding an opening for the immediate, tactical interests of their own ideologies.
(under the pretext of assaulting, defending, and otherwise assailing against propaganda).
Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy or propaganda.