In a message dated 2/24/2008 4:35:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, dgerard@gmail.com writes:

I eagerly await you making the actual issue clear, because so far your answers in this thread have dodged every possible attempt by several people to actually pin them down to a credible complaint.>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- The link provided gives ample evidence of the issues, and how BC responded to them.

When bots are automatically given precedence over the issues raised by established editors, and those editors valid issues are dismissed in favor of bots, then the project has gone off-track.

Read over the page, bearing in mind that the concerns raised *just might be* valid, instead of assuming that all the editors with concerns are just a pack of whiners :)

Anytime we have super-secret code, making hundreds of thousands of edits to an "open" project, we have a problem. I'm not the only one to see it.

**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)