------------- Original message --------------
I don't think you have a right to remove comments on your own RfC. A request for comment is just that: a chance for those both involved and uninvolved to comment on an article or user's situation. [[User:Fawcett5]]'s comments was also at the end of a list, not above signatures. If there is confusion, look at the timestamp on the sigs. That's why we have them.
The signatures are four or five sections BELOW her insertion. And what you reverted was not the insertion of her "correction", but was the insertion of both the error and the correct, and was a total null effect that did not belong in the RfC at all, and definitely not in the section signed by others. -- Silverback
I apologize: I have the information slightly wrong. Fawcett5 was adding some informatino to the page, then corrected her mistake. Still, there is no reason to remove her statements. Doing it yourself on your own RfC makes it seem slightly suspicious.
-Ben
On 10/16/05, actionforum@comcast.net actionforum@comcast.net wrote:
------------- Original message --------------
I don't think you have a right to remove comments on your own RfC. A
request
for comment is just that: a chance for those both involved and
uninvolved to
comment on an article or user's situation. [[User:Fawcett5]]'s comments
was
also at the end of a list, not above signatures. If there is confusion,
look
at the timestamp on the sigs. That's why we have them.
The signatures are four or five sections BELOW her insertion. And what you reverted was not the insertion of her "correction", but was the insertion of both the error and the correct, and was a total null effect that did not belong in the RfC at all, and definitely not in the section signed by others. -- Silverback _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Bratsche-It means "viola!"