On 5/2/07, Jeff Raymond <jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Sure I
would. I significant chunk of them can't read basic non-legalese
CSD policy as is, and we expect them to be able to make legal
distinctions?
No, I don't. I'm advocating allowing any admin who recognizes
blatantly illegal stuff to "delete" it (i.e. temporarily remove it
from the view of non-admins pending a further discussion). I'm not
advocating forcing all admins to do so.
Which gets back to the basic protest - I don't trust admins to
accurately recognizer "blatantly illegal stuff."
And I still don't see how that is relevant.
If we had a speedy deletion criterion that said that you could delete
articles about apples, would you oppose that because you don't trust
admins to accurately recognize apples?
The rule is what it is. You're allowed to delete blatantly illegal
stuff. If you delete something that isn't illegal, then you haven't
followed the rule. You might get away with it, but not because of the
rule.
Anthony