Put 'em on Wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moro_reflex http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moro_reflex_in_four-day-old_infant.og...
(and cheers to Sage ;-) )
- d.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:56 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Put 'em on Wikipedia!
Is it still super complicated and like a lot of hard work?
Steve
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:56 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Put 'em on Wikipedia!
Is it still super complicated and like a lot of hard work?
It's not too hard now if you're running Firefox 3.5. Just edit your video in whatever video software is easiest on your machine (e.g., Windows Movie Maker) and save a high quality version in a convenient format (e.g., AVI, MPEG, other common formats), then go firefogg.org, install the plug-in, click "make ogg", and use the default encoding settings.
If you're feeling especially ambitious, you can add metadata and/or fiddle with the resolution and bit-rate settings (all through firefogg). Converting to Commons-ready ogg with firefogg is actually easier than uploading a file to Commons.
-Sage
2009/9/27 Sage Ross <ragesoss+wikipedia@gmail.comragesoss%2Bwikipedia@gmail.com
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:56 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Put 'em on Wikipedia!
Is it still super complicated and like a lot of hard work?
It's not too hard now if you're running Firefox 3.5. Just edit your video in whatever video software is easiest on your machine (e.g., Windows Movie Maker) and save a high quality version in a convenient format (e.g., AVI, MPEG, other common formats), then go firefogg.org, install the plug-in, click "make ogg", and use the default encoding settings.
If you're feeling especially ambitious, you can add metadata and/or fiddle with the resolution and bit-rate settings (all through firefogg). Converting to Commons-ready ogg with firefogg is actually easier than uploading a file to Commons.
See now...when I read Steve's question, I was thinking about the "hard work" of taking care of the star of the film...
Cheers, Sage.
Risker
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
It's not too hard now if you're running Firefox 3.5. Just edit your video in whatever video software is easiest on your machine (e.g., Windows Movie Maker) and save a high quality version in a convenient format (e.g., AVI, MPEG, other common formats), then go firefogg.org, install the plug-in, click "make ogg", and use the default encoding settings.
If you're feeling especially ambitious, you can add metadata and/or fiddle with the resolution and bit-rate settings (all through firefogg). Converting to Commons-ready ogg with firefogg is actually easier than uploading a file to Commons.
Hmm, sounds like that would make a good extension to Commonist.
Steve
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
It's not too hard now if you're running Firefox 3.5. Just edit your video in whatever video software is easiest on your machine (e.g., Windows Movie Maker) and save a high quality version in a convenient format (e.g., AVI, MPEG, other common formats), then go firefogg.org, install the plug-in, click "make ogg", and use the default encoding settings.
If you're feeling especially ambitious, you can add metadata and/or fiddle with the resolution and bit-rate settings (all through firefogg). Converting to Commons-ready ogg with firefogg is actually easier than uploading a file to Commons.
Hmm, sounds like that would make a good extension to Commonist.
Firefogg is part of the "add media wizard" that (I think) is being refined for default deployment on Commons. (It's already available if you add a bit of code to your javascript page.) So yeah, sooner or later it will be possible for many users to simply upload their non-free format videos have them seamlessly transcoded.
Along the same lines, hopefully Commonist will simply become unnecessary and batch uploads possible without extra software.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
See now...when I read Steve's question, I was thinking about the "hard work" of taking care of the star of the film...
All the jokes I thought of in response require too much familiarity with me to be unambiguously non-sexist to WikiEN-l subscribers, so I'll just say... that's how I read the question at first, too.
-Sage
Congratulations! And thanks for your dedication to the project. You realize when he turns thirteen he's going to die of embarrassment over this...?
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Sage Ross <ragesoss+wikipedia@gmail.comragesoss%2Bwikipedia@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Sage Ross <ragesoss+wikipedia@gmail.comragesoss%2Bwikipedia@gmail.com>
wrote:
It's not too hard now if you're running Firefox 3.5. Just edit your video in whatever video software is easiest on your machine (e.g., Windows Movie Maker) and save a high quality version in a convenient format (e.g., AVI, MPEG, other common formats), then go firefogg.org, install the plug-in, click "make ogg", and use the default encoding settings.
If you're feeling especially ambitious, you can add metadata and/or fiddle with the resolution and bit-rate settings (all through firefogg). Converting to Commons-ready ogg with firefogg is actually easier than uploading a file to Commons.
Hmm, sounds like that would make a good extension to Commonist.
Firefogg is part of the "add media wizard" that (I think) is being refined for default deployment on Commons. (It's already available if you add a bit of code to your javascript page.) So yeah, sooner or later it will be possible for many users to simply upload their non-free format videos have them seamlessly transcoded.
Along the same lines, hopefully Commonist will simply become unnecessary and batch uploads possible without extra software.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
See now...when I read Steve's question, I was thinking about the "hard
work"
of taking care of the star of the film...
All the jokes I thought of in response require too much familiarity with me to be unambiguously non-sexist to WikiEN-l subscribers, so I'll just say... that's how I read the question at first, too.
-Sage
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
2009/9/28 Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com:
Congratulations! And thanks for your dedication to the project. You realize when he turns thirteen he's going to die of embarrassment over this...?
Only if he hasn't made admin yet.
- d.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations! And thanks for your dedication to the project. You realize when he turns thirteen he's going to die of embarrassment over this...?
That's the idea. We're stocking up on embarrassing things we can show to his first girlfriend/boyfriend. :)
I'd be surprised (and disappointed) if someone doesn't put up a better video of the Moro reflex by the time he's 13, though. It's finally becoming easy to make videos for Wikimedia projects.
-Sage
Sage Ross wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations! And thanks for your dedication to the project. You realize when he turns thirteen he's going to die of embarrassment over this...?
That's the idea. We're stocking up on embarrassing things we can show to his first girlfriend/boyfriend. :)
The exception would be if that first boy/girlfriend is met on wiki. :-)
Ec