Please tell me how I can get my emails to post properly in the mailing list. It appears that they are not using wordwrap.
----
Could somebody explain Wik's reversions to me, he continues to refuse to explain his edits in any manner which makes sense to me. I am trying to avoid edit wars; but, the flipside is that the community needs to become more active. I personally believe he is reverting things solely because I entered them, and I would like this to be addressed. Even if he does think of a reason to revert, I think he is coming up with the reason after reverting -- his primary motive, imo, is to revert.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Moon&diff=0&oldid=1736025 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Impressionism&diff=1724861&am...
While my edits are not perfect, and they should be edited, I don't feel such edits should be reverted. I believe that both the above are excellent examples of what I do here on the wiki -- the vast majority of my edits are of this caliber -- so please, either criticize me or Wik; somebody is in the wrong here.
Please tell me how I can get my emails to post properly in the mailing list. It appears that they are not using wordwrap. ---- Could somebody explain Wik's reversions to me, he continues to refuse to explain his edits in any manner which makes sense to me. I am trying to avoid edit wars; but, the flipside is that the community needs to become more active. I personally believe he is reverting things solely because I entered them, and I would like this to be addressed. Even if he does think of a reason to revert, I think he is coming up with the reason after reverting -- his primary motive, imo, is to revert. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Moon&diff=0&oldid=1736025 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Impressionism&diff=1724861&am... 827 While my edits are not perfect, and they should be edited, I don't feel such edits should be reverted. I believe that both the above are excellent examples of what I do here on the wiki -- the vast majority of my edits are of this caliber -- so please, either criticize me or Wik; somebody is in the wrong here.
I suggest you avoid editing anything Wik edits until something gives. Pass this on to others for awhile. You are not the little Dutch boy;
Fred
Fred Bauder wrote:
Could somebody explain Wik's reversions to me, he continues to refuse to explain his edits in any manner which makes sense to me. I am trying to avoid edit wars; but, the flipside is that the community needs to become more active. I personally believe he is reverting things solely because I entered them, and I would like this to be addressed. Even if he does think of a reason to revert, I think he is coming up with the reason after reverting -- his primary motive, imo, is to revert. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Moon&diff=0&oldid=1736025 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Impressionism&diff=1724861&am... While my edits are not perfect, and they should be edited, I don't feel such edits should be reverted. I believe that both the above are excellent examples of what I do here on the wiki -- the vast majority of my edits are of this caliber -- so please, either criticize me or Wik; somebody is in the wrong here.
I suggest you avoid editing anything Wik edits until something gives. Pass this on to others for awhile. You are not the little Dutch boy;
Sound advice in this case, and Adam is right that there should be more community involvement on this. I think that Adam/Lir has made genuine efforts to live down his past reputation.
Wik seems to be carrying on like the "friend" that keeps offering drinks to the reformed alcoholic.
Ec