-----Original Message----- From: Guy Chapman aka JzG [mailto:guy.chapman@spamcop.net] Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2007 05:26 AM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:30:08 +0100, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
The active remedy from MONGO applies only to ED, not to WR or any other site that someone decides is an "attack site".
Wikilawyering, I'm afraid. The active remedy is based on the following principles:
Links to attack site 3) Links to attack sites may be removed by any user; such removals are exempt from 3RR. Deliberately linking to an attack site may be grounds for blocking.
Support of harassment 7) Users who link to webpages which attack or harass other users or to sites which regularly engage in such activity are responsible for their actions Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks#Off-wiki_personal_attacks.
Outing sites as attack sites 11) A website that engages in the practice of publishing private information concerning the identities of Wikipedia participants will be regarded as an attack site whose pages should not be linked to from Wikipedia pages under any circumstances.
Tell me how WR does not fit these criteria.
Guy (JzG)
From time to time they discuss issues in a more or less sane way.
Fred
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:19:05 +0000, "Fred Bauder" fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
From time to time they discuss issues in a more or less sane way.
Hmmm. Allegedly. But every thread I've seen has at least some "fuck, no!" comments in it.
Guy (JzG)
Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:19:05 +0000, "Fred Bauder" fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
From time to time they discuss issues in a more or less sane way.
Hmmm. Allegedly. But every thread I've seen has at least some "fuck, no!" comments in it.
So your entire argument is based on your personal dislike of profanity?
Ec
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:52:06 -0700, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Hmmm. Allegedly. But every thread I've seen has at least some "fuck, no!" comments in it.
So your entire argument is based on your personal dislike of profanity?
Never read my talk page, have you?
I mean: every thread I have seen has some comments that would lead me to say "fuck, no!" if anyone suggested linking them.
Guy (JzG)