In a message dated 3/2/2008 4:28:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, thomas.dalton@gmail.com writes:
but they are a tiny minority of complaints levelled against admins.>>
-------------------------- Maybe. I would suggest however that they are a much larger percentage of those complaints that come before AN/I.
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
On 03/03/2008, WJhonson@aol.com WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 3/2/2008 4:28:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, thomas.dalton@gmail.com writes:
but they are a tiny minority of complaints levelled against admins.>>
Maybe. I would suggest however that they are a much larger percentage of those complaints that come before AN/I.
All of which are looked at by people quite keen to nail admins on violations of such, and almost none of which pan out. This leads to a certain deprecation of such complaints in practice, per the crying wolf phenomenon. Which is probably unfortunate.
- d.
All of which are looked at by people quite keen to nail admins on violations of such, and almost none of which pan out. This leads to a certain deprecation of such complaints in practice, per the crying wolf phenomenon. Which is probably unfortunate.
Yes, it's very unfortunate. So many complaints are unfounded that people end up assuming all complaints are unfounded and it can take a long time to get a genuinely bad admin desysopped.