pg A24: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30326-2004Sep17.html
Of course, the subtly misguided original was on the front page of the Tech section... I'm sure the Wikipedia disclaimer will be a point of debate for a long time to come.
+sj+
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 01:20:09 -0400, Sj 2.718281828@gmail.com wrote:
pg A24: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30326-2004Sep17.html
Of course, the subtly misguided original was on the front page of the Tech section... I'm sure the Wikipedia disclaimer will be a point of
...or rather, the front page of the Business section.
And I take no responsibility for that choppy last paragraph; it was grammatical (and a few characters shorter!) before they edited it.
Sj wrote:
pg A24: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30326-2004Sep17.html
[...]
In the print edition it's very prominently displayed. The letter appears about half-way down the page and is boxed.
Bill