Looks like Wikipedia has another dissatisfied customer:
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83640
The cached copy that Farah mentioned is not hosted by WP, it is hosted by Yahoo. Joseph Farah has a right to his own views. While I am a strong evangelical Christian like Farah, WorldNetDaily (WND) and Joseph Farah need to know that studies have proved time and again that Wikipedia has been reliable and most vandalism is removed quickly. WND had lost my personal support when it bought into the Obama citizenship conspiracy theory (Side note: I voted for McCain), and now it is preparing a boycott of Wikipedia all because of one anonymous editor's vandalism. Ugh.
William King (Willking1979)
Hi,
A strong Christian myself, I usually tend to avoid sites that claim to be both reliable and operated around particular beliefs/ideologies/philosophies/politics/etc., since they usually tend to be the latter and not the former--they are commonly focused more on proving their beliefs are correct than on actually being reliable.
That's my opinion, anyway ...
--Thomas Larsen