Stevertigo wrote:
- Type " nominate for VfD in 2 weeks. ~~~~"
Actually we want to keep comments brief as possible -- so just VFD is always fine. Also, just use ~~~ -- not
I know but I had a conflicting design objective. I needed to come up with a process which could satisfy those who would list a page on VfD. IMO that requires two features: a definite timeline and feedback so they can see whether they are happy with the result and list it on VfD if they aren't. ~~~~ is the easiest way to both give a timestamp and identify who wants to be given feedback.
--- user_Jamesday user_Jamesday@myrealbox.com wrote:
I know but I had a conflicting design objective. I needed to come up with a process which could satisfy those who would list a page on VfD. IMO that requires two features: a definite timeline and feedback so they can see whether they are happy with the result and list it on VfD if they aren't. ~~~~ is the easiest way to both give a timestamp and identify who wants to be given feedback.
Originally, I wanted to use timestamp headers as breaks --but we dont have non-sig timestamps (AFAIK) --and they wouldnt work well anyway if they were minute specific -- hours is still too small considering the average load of about ten articles a day (AFAIK). Maybe just using a day tag (like VFD) would be fine for now. :\
<fancy> Maybe coding something like /early morning/ noon/ afternoon/ evening/ night/ late night/ stamps -- as better delimiters. These could display differently --appropriate to the local time of the user . </fancy>
~S~
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/