Asking for advice whether (a) pseudoscience-watch and "Einstein-disproved"-watch made me overly paranoid, or (b) normal AfD procedure is OK, or (c) more drastic measures are to be taken
See list of articles and AfDs posted here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry#Strange_se...
http://www.hy-drive.com/ and http://www.hypowerfuel.com/ are traded on TSX Venture Exchange and OTCBB.PK respectively. Very low volume of course.
They have very professional looking websites but no news coverage and a product which I'd consider to be complete crap:
Using a car's on board generator producing electricity to hydrolyse water to oxygen and hydrogen which then are fed back into the car's motor to be burned there...
Having a nice article on Wikipedia, even for short time, may make a big difference for them.
Comments?
Regards, Peter
On 11/22/06, Peter Jacobi peter_jacobi@gmx.net wrote:
Asking for advice whether (a) pseudoscience-watch and "Einstein-disproved"-watch made me overly paranoid, or (b) normal AfD procedure is OK, or (c) more drastic measures are to be taken
See list of articles and AfDs posted here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry#Strange_se...
http://www.hy-drive.com/ and http://www.hypowerfuel.com/ are traded on TSX Venture Exchange and OTCBB.PK respectively. Very low volume of course.
They have very professional looking websites but no news coverage and a product which I'd consider to be complete crap:
Using a car's on board generator producing electricity to hydrolyse water to oxygen and hydrogen which then are fed back into the car's motor to be burned there...
Having a nice article on Wikipedia, even for short time, may make a big difference for them.
Comments?
Regards, Peter
-- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
In this case probably not because they have already had mainstream media coverage. It is likely that it will happen in future though.
geni wrote:
On 11/22/06, Peter Jacobi peter_jacobi@gmx.net wrote:
<snip>
They have very professional looking websites but no news coverage and a product which I'd consider to be complete crap:
Using a car's on board generator producing electricity to hydrolyse water to oxygen and hydrogen which then are fed back into the car's motor to be burned there...
Having a nice article on Wikipedia, even for short time, may make a big difference for them.
Comments?
In this case probably not because they have already had mainstream media coverage. It is likely that it will happen in future though.
For some inexplicable reason the media tend to stay away from perpetual motion machines, even though they go for all the other pseudoscience.
On 11/23/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
For some inexplicable reason the media tend to stay away from perpetual motion machines, even though they go for all the other pseudoscience.
Not in this case. Couple of months back this was springing up all over the place. I though running cars on water went out decades ago.