You're off-topic, the text in question relates to ozone depletion, not to global warming.

Fred

From: "Poor, Edmund W" Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:50:16 -0500 To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] William Connelley no longer neutral contributor (Re: toJimbo)

Alan asks:

...

Here the question is - does nearly every expert in whatever field "global warming" falls under (environmental science, or whatever) accept William Connolley's claim? I don't know yet.

That's precisely the question we've been trying to answer, and the two points of view are:

• The Democratic Party of the US, along with the Clinton EPA and the

UN's climate panel (IPCC) say that "nearly every expert" accepts the GW theory (which William also supports).

• Others, like Bush (a politician); Lindzen and Balunias (scientists),

Singer and Seitz (retired scientists) that that "less than half of all experts" accept the GW theory.

So there is a dispute over whether there is a consensus about a theory. Is that clear now?

Uncle Ed _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l