On 31/05/07, Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)att.net> wrote:
jayjg wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>> Here's a fourth case: the Brandt link on Wikipedia Signpost.
> I don't see any specific benefit to Wikipedia in having its unofficial
> newspaper link to WR.
Just to keep the facts straight, the link in question
was not a link to
Wikipedia Review. I know Sheldon has mentioned the possibility of such
links in discussion of hypotheticals, but I don't recall that The
Wikipedia Signpost has ever linked to Wikipedia Review.
Right. So what was the reasoning given for the repeated removal of the
non-WR link?
- d.