On 4/16/07, Gallagher Mark George <m.g.gallagher(a)student.canberra.edu.au> wrote:
Did you wander away from your computer for a second,
only to find that some malicious daemon (who, clearly, is not as smart as you are) had
typed a paragraph and sent it off before you could return?
Since when was a closing admin required to follow the vote count, and since when was
failing to do so an excellent reason for re-education procedures?
What he said was reasonable. 17% support being interpreted as
consensus is uncommon. It's not unreasonable for people to ask how
that interpretation was made. And if it was arrived at unduly, the
admin should indeed be "reeducated".
Steve