"Childlove movement" is a POV euphemism for pedophilia advocacy. There is currently and AFD on the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Childlove_movem... however, we have a small number of pedophilia advocates (self-identified on their user pages) who have been editing pedophilia related articles in an attempt to promote their POV.

What this means is there may not be "consensus" at the AFD to take action such as deleting, merging or renaming the article. However, I think it's quite clear that the name of the article at least is POV.

Just as we would not allow a small group of dedicated anti-Semities to maintain an article title such as "Holohoax" we shouldn't allow a small group of pedophiles to use wikipedia to promote their preferred terminology of "childlover".

Any ideas as to how we should handle this? If a small group of dedicated advocates can block consensus that is a serious threat to our NPOV policy.

Homey