On 30 Nov 2006 at 22:29, "Oldak Quill" oldakquill@gmail.com wrote:
Discussing everything and achieving community concensus, rather than acting on the instinct of one particular user, is a tenant of Wikipedia.
A tenant of Wikipedia? How high is the rent?
On 12/3/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 30 Nov 2006 at 22:29, "Oldak Quill" oldakquill@gmail.com wrote:
Discussing everything and achieving community concensus, rather than acting on the instinct of one particular user, is a tenant of Wikipedia.
A tenant of Wikipedia? How high is the rent?
Oh, it's free to live here, but you have to vacuum the lobby when it gets dirty.
-humblefool
On 03/12/06, David Ashby humble.fool@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/3/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
A tenant of Wikipedia? How high is the rent?
Oh, it's free to live here, but you have to vacuum the lobby when it gets dirty.
:)
On 130/11/06 *Old**ak Quill* oldakquill@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/11/06, Rob <gamaliel8 at gmail.com http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l> wrote:
- Yes, but the consensus is amongst the vast majority of non-Nazis that*>* they are offensive. There is no need for an all or nothing*>* requirement here.*
The concensus among most non-Republicans is that they are morally offensive. The same goes for the Democrats. So what?
After the Christina Jeffrey affair, the post of Historian of the House of
Representatives sat vacant for 10 years until the appointment of Robert V. Remini author of numerous works on the founder of the Democratic Party, Andrew Jackson. The Wikipedia article refers to his policy of "Indian Removal"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson#.22Indian_Removal.22
of course today we would use terms like "deportation" or "extermination". This Amazon book review uses the term "racist".
http://www.amazon.com/Andrew-Jackson-His-Life-Times/dp/0385507380