-----Original Message----- From: Rob Smith [mailto:nobs03@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 06:32 PM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom pages and Google
I would like to formerly request an unblock for the limited purpose to Appeal before ArbCom making a separation of the unfounded smears that my name is associated with he Lyndon LaRouche movement. < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance/Requ...
Google Nobs01+LaRouche brings up 226 Google hits. < http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Nobs01%2BLaRouche >
ArbCom has twice failed to rectify this injustice, despite (a) Mr. Fred Bauder admitting five times the smear is unfounded; (b) the perpetrator himself has made statements that the allegation is false. < http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration...
Thank you,
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 and Nobs02
We already know this. You got lumped together in the arbitration case, but there was no connection.
Fred
On 3/26/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Rob Smith [mailto:nobs03@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 06:32 PM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom pages and Google
I would like to formerly request an unblock for the limited purpose to Appeal before ArbCom making a separation of the unfounded smears that my name is associated with he Lyndon LaRouche movement. <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance/Requ...
Google Nobs01+LaRouche brings up 226 Google hits. < http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Nobs01%2BLaRouche >
ArbCom has twice failed to rectify this injustice, despite (a) Mr. Fred Bauder admitting five times the smear is unfounded; (b) the perpetrator himself has made statements that the allegation is false. <
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration...
Thank you,
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 and Nobs02
We already know this. You got lumped together in the arbitration case, but there was no connection.
Fred
There is a simple solution: separate and move the Findings & Remedies regarding the LaRouche editors out of the case and rename it LaRouche3. This can be done without rehearing any substanitive issues.
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 & Nobs02
There is a simple solution: separate and move the Findings & Remedies regarding the LaRouche editors out of the case and rename it LaRouche3. This can be done without rehearing any substanitive issues.
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 & Nobs02
If you want to pursue this, it should be with the arbitrators, not on this general mailing list. Ordinary users can do nothing about the matter you are raising; conversely, many of the arbitrators may not be subscribed or reading here.
Newyorkbrad
On 3/26/07, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) newyorkbrad@gmail.com wrote:
There is a simple solution: separate and move the Findings & Remedies regarding the LaRouche editors out of the case and rename it LaRouche3. This can be done without rehearing any substanitive issues.
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 & Nobs02
If you want to pursue this, it should be with the arbitrators, not on this general mailing list. Ordinary users can do nothing about the matter you are raising; conversely, many of the arbitrators may not be subscribed or reading here.
Newyorkbrad
Thank you. This involves two steps (1) a limited unblock (2) forwarding this request to ArbCom1. Given the serious nature of these slanders that Google picks up, and my efforts at redress through Wikipedia's internal regulatory processes, coupled with bureaucratic rebuffs, this thread here appears to be the first time this problem has been brought to the attention of the Community.
Is there a way to expedite a limited unblock for the purpose of ArbCom addressing a very simple matter that could be disposed fairly quickly and painlessly? This matter has lingered for one and half years now and must be addressed sooner or later.
Thank you.
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 & Nobs02
On 3/26/07, Rob Smith nobs03@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/26/07, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) newyorkbrad@gmail.com wrote:
There is a simple solution: separate and move the Findings & Remedies regarding the LaRouche editors out of the case and rename it
LaRouche3.
This can be done without rehearing any substanitive issues.
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 & Nobs02
If you want to pursue this, it should be with the arbitrators, not on
this
general mailing list. Ordinary users can do nothing about the matter
you
are raising; conversely, many of the arbitrators may not be subscribed
or
reading here.
Newyorkbrad
Thank you. This involves two steps (1) a limited unblock (2) forwarding this request to ArbCom1. Given the serious nature of these slanders that Google picks up, and my efforts at redress through Wikipedia's internal regulatory processes, coupled with bureaucratic rebuffs, this thread here appears to be the first time this problem has been brought to the attention of the Community.
Is there a way to expedite a limited unblock for the purpose of ArbCom addressing a very simple matter that could be disposed fairly quickly and painlessly? This matter has lingered for one and half years now and must be addressed sooner or later.
Thank you.
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 & Nobs02
Any such request must be addressed to the Arbitration Committee. You can e-mail me a request to forward to the committee if you wish, or perhaps one of the arbitrators who is subscribed here will indicate that he is doing so. I have no view on the merits of such request but obviously as clerk will implement any changes authorized by the committee.
Newyorkbrad
On 26/03/07, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) newyorkbrad@gmail.com wrote:
Any such request must be addressed to the Arbitration Committee. You can e-mail me a request to forward to the committee if you wish, or perhaps one of the arbitrators who is subscribed here will indicate that he is doing so. I have no view on the merits of such request but obviously as clerk will implement any changes authorized by the committee.
Emailing an arbitrator or a clerk will get email to the AC, and there's the direct address, arbcom-l - the list is moderated, but basically anything from a human is let straight through (and the buckets of spam aren't).
- d.
On 3/26/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/03/07, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) newyorkbrad@gmail.com wrote:
Any such request must be addressed to the Arbitration Committee. You
can
e-mail me a request to forward to the committee if you wish, or perhaps
one
of the arbitrators who is subscribed here will indicate that he is doing so. I have no view on the merits of such request but obviously as clerk will implement any changes authorized by the committee.
Emailing an arbitrator or a clerk will get email to the AC, and there's the direct address, arbcom-l - the list is moderated, but basically anything from a human is let straight through (and the buckets of spam aren't).
- d.
Thank you. I will likewise forward an unblock request to unblock-1
Rob Smith aka User:Nobs01 & Nobs02