Anthere writes:

can't help but take with a grain of salt the issue you raise above, with the fact you listed [[Militant Islam]] for deletion just after RK redirected it with justifications which were not convincing.

That's nonsense. The reasons stated were not only convincing, they always have been STANDARD WIKIPEDIA POLICY.

It is a clear violation of Wikipedia NPOV and naming policy to make an exact copy of an article we already have, retitle it, and then edit it to push your own political and religious views. People may not create their own private encyclopedias within Wikipedia which bypass our normal peer review process.

If someone doesn't like the article on [[Flowers]], or on [[History]] or on [[Islamism]], they are welcome to work with others in editing it and improving it. But they may not copy this article, and make their own POV version of it, and set up their private enyclopedia within Wikipedia.

This is hardly "not convincing". This is the standard Wikipedia policy that all of us have always followed from the beginning. If people like EntmootsOfTrolls find themselves unable to follow our NPOV policy, and unable to work with others in reaching a consensus, then they should stay away from those articles altogether.

Robert (RK)

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com