--- "Daniel P.B.Smith" <dpbsmith(a)verizon.net>
schrieb:
Since I happen to be a U. S. citizen who believes
that the USA almost certainly did back the coup
against Allende, and since I have been utterly
uninvolved in any articles about that subject, I
decided to see whether there really is a problem
with Wikipedia's coverage of the topic. I typed
in "Allende," it redirected to "Salvador Allende,"
and under "The coup" I read:
(a rather good sumary)
It's one of the interesting aspects of Wikipedia that
conflicts on wordings often are focused to one or a
few articles at a time. One must guess that in the
long run the articles on [[Augusto Pinochet]] and
[[1973 Chilean Coup]] would be put in harmony with the
article on [[Salvador Allende]]; but the fierce
reversion wars (and actually also fierce debate at
[[Talk:Augusto Pinochet]], which is a good sign after
all) makes me wonder whether the article on Salvador
Allende is next in turn to be "sanitized".
Libertarian, why do you suggest that the admins are
"not allowing the point" to be made? It seems to me
that the point_is_ being made.
I think administrators' role is exaggerated by
Libertarian. But we have to be aware of Wikipedia's
inherent US-centricism, and how this may be a serious
disadvantage for Wikipedia's credibility outside of
the Anglo-Saxon world.
/M.L.
Bestellen Sie Y! DSL und erhalten Sie die AVM "FritzBox SL" für 0.
Sie sparen 119 und bekommen 2 Monate Grundgebührbefreiung.
http://de.adsl.yahoo.com