They handle web memes better than we do in terms of accuracy, maybe not as much as taste. Their "attacks" on Wikipedians constitute a minimal amount of their content, albeit more than what was there when I was a contributor. Most of their content revolves around LiveJournal.
-Jeff
Through the MONGO arbitration case the arbitration committee has probably restricted activities related to dem attica as much as appropriate. Main thing, don't make links to them. Editors who are active on dam attic may edit Wikipedia, but are expected to wear their Wikipedia hat, not their Dramatic hat. Going further is probably inappropriate, even mean-sprited.
Fred
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:51:05 +0000, "Fred Bauder" fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
Through the MONGO arbitration case the arbitration committee has probably restricted activities related to dem attica as much as appropriate. Main thing, don't make links to them. Editors who are active on dam attic may edit Wikipedia, but are expected to wear their Wikipedia hat, not their Dramatic hat. Going further is probably inappropriate, even mean-sprited.
Some people who edit Wikipedia have taken a part in editing these articles. That is not good. But a wise man said to me that if they are jerks, they will be jerks on Wikipedia and then we can deal with them. This is sage advice. I am watching.
Jeff gets some shit for having been involved with ED. I say that Jeff is emphatically not a jerk. He is not one of the ones on my watchlist.
Guy (JzG)