"Jimmy Wales" <jwales(a)bomis.com>
schrieb:
Louis Kyu Won Ryu wrote:
Root causes of the "current upset" have
everything to do with Wikipedia
policies and customs, in particular, the absence of some sort of means
for dealing with article disputes that cannot be solved within the Wiki
consensus editing model.
Is there any evidence that this is the case in the current
controversy? What I mean is that the article already seems much
improved over the past several weeks. So in what way is it really
true that the problem can't be solved within the Wiki consensus
editing model?
It is not working in that the consensus editing model can make POV
lines and paragraphs NPOV, can correct factual errors and so forth,
but the issue with the page is that a number of people (me included)
are of the opinion that large amount of texts should be either
removed from the page or severely shortened, and others (in
particular Ec) will never get in consensus with such a change.
Huh?? I've not been involved with the article. I agree that it can be
trimmed down. Much of what is said about Keating should be removed as
irrelevant. You must be thinking of someone else.
Ec